Please log in before proceeding

Do you think the idea of logging in to a secure server is a safe as it could be. Or more to the point do people who log into secure websites even know the difference between a safe and unsafe site? I think no. So is it the idea of the lock all over again. The idea that people who rob houses aren't deterred by locks and say break a window...Or go down the street to the house without the alarm...Or disconnect the alarm. It's really then just an idea to make people feel safe using an illusion of safety. Not safety but a belief that we are safe. Like the idea that money is worthless expect that it's backed up by the full faith and support of the government. So people feel safe with illusions of what they really want. Security, monetary systems, or an effect we might have on the world around us. Lets worry about a meteor say. So we can spend tons of money to build a meteor defense strategy that might save us but in reality can't...inevitability is a mighty strong focker. So you create fear and then you create product? Or you create a product that introduces a new fear? It's one way things are done. So then there's the other that says: "Hey lets do something to address x problem" I take a dump and don't want to stare at it tell it drys up so I make a toilet to whisk it away. They are both really great models and I suppose both have there place. So which do I prefer...Well I am paranoid enough so I go for the fear play. Make people even lazier than they already are and you will have a great invention I say. Remote controls rule!